Par MMaxi le 20 March 2008 à 13:11
An old woman is sitting quietly in her chair. On the table beside her is a book. She is wearing a kind of two-piece: a black dress and matching coat trimmed with fur, which is draped elegantly over the chair. In her hand is a handkerchief. This type of costume was fashionable around 1640 but the large ruff and the cap with wing flaps were out-of-date by this time. Nevertheless, the older generation tended to ignore the whims of fashion and continued to wear these garments.
Ferdinand Bol (1616-1680)
The artist Ferdinand Bol grew up in Dordrecht. He learned to paint either there or in Utrecht under the artist Abraham Bloemaert. Later Bol worked for a period at the studio of Rembrandts in Amsterdam, before setting up as an independent artist in 1642. Bol mainly produced portraits and history paintings. At first his work resembled Rembrandt's, but after 1650 he developed a more colourful and elegant style. Bol received numerous commissions, including for the Amsterdam town hall and the Admiralty. After 1669 and his second marriage to Anna van Arckel, Bol, now a wealthy man, hardly painted anymore. His self portrait of the late 1660s is one of his last works.
Elisabeth Jacobsdr. Bas (1571-1649), widow of Jochem Hendricksz. Swartenhont
Oil on canvas
118 x 91,5 cm
Par MMaxi le 16 March 2008 à 13:19
Duchamp, Man Ray, Picabia
21 February – 26 May 2008
Duchamp set himself the challenge of making art works
that were not works of art, as traditionally understood.
He decided that an art work did not need to be either
visually appealing or even made by the artist. Accordingly,
he chose a number of ‘readymade’ objects, of no
aesthetic merit, and gave them the usual attributes of a
work of art: a title, a named author, a date of execution,
and a viewing public or owner. His Fountain – an ordinary
urinal laid on its back – was rejected from an exhibition
in 1917. This, and more importantly, the ensuing debate
about what constitutes a work of art, is now seen as
a turning point in the history of modernism.
Rather than readymades, Man Ray produced what he called
‘objects of my affection’: two or more elements combined
to create a new work. He also used his camera to record
transient or ephemeral items that caught his eye. Here it
was the photograph that was the work of art, rather than
the object itself.
Marcel Duchamp, Man Ray and Francis Picabia were at the cutting edge of art in the first half of the twentieth century, and made a lasting impression on modern and contemporary art. Duchamp invented the concept of the ‘readymade’: presenting an everyday object as an artwork, Man Ray pioneered avant-garde photographic and film techniques and Picabia’s use of kitsch, popular or low-brow imagery in his paintings undermined artistic conventions.
Their shared outlook on life and art, with a taste for jokes, irony and the erotic, forged a friendship that provided support and inspiration. At the heart of the Dada movement and moving in the same artistic circles, they discussed ideas and collaborated, echoing and responding to each other’s works. Duchamp, Man Ray, Picabia explores their affinities and parallels, uncovering a shared approach to questioning the nature of art.
Par MMaxi le 16 March 2008 à 02:52
Wilhelmina of Prussia
Princess Wilhelmina of Prussia (1751-1820) was the wife of Stadholder William V. They were married in 1767 when Wilhelmina was sixteen and William nineteen. This portrait was painted twenty-two years later, in 1789 as a present to William V from their two oldest children, Louise and William Frederick. It is an unusual portrait in that the princess is not riding side-saddle (with both legs on one side of the horse), the usual pose for a woman. She is sitting astride the horse as a man would have done. The tower in the background is Jacob's church in The Hague.
Title Frederika Sophia Wilhelmina of Prussia (1751-1820). Equestrian portrait of the wife of Prince Willia
Artist Tethart Philipp Christian Haag
Technique Oil on canvas
Dimensions 86 x 69 cm
Par MMaxi le 11 March 2008 à 01:15
A young woman leans over weakly in her chair, her head resting on a cushion on the table. The doctor is taking her pulse. What is the young lady suffering from? Probably she is not ill, just hopelessly in love. She is 'lovesick', her heart is broken. Jan Steen, the artist who painted the scene, depicted her with blushing cheeks and a smile on her lips. Contemporaries of Jan Steen would immediately have seen that this was not a real emergency. The 'doctor' is wearing clothes which were by then old-fashioned. Doctors in garments such as these were confined to the stage, where playwrights made fun of incompetent quacks.
Title The Sick Woman
Year c. 1665
ArtistJan Havicksz. Steen
Technique Oil on canvas
Dimensions 76 x 63,5 cm
Follow this section's article RSS flux
Follow this section's comments RSS flux